Memphis Aggravated Robbery Sentences and Case Outcomes
Underwood’s two eight-year robbery terms are distinct from his 25-year murder term. Wilkerson’s 2016 and 2020 opinions identify two robbery convictions with 20 years each, consecutive; the 2024 opinion uses “aggravated assault” while referencing the same case. That unresolved document-label conflict prevents treating its later text as unqualified robbery evidence.
These two selected prosecution records are not two fully qualified comparable incorporated-city outcomes. Multiple defendants, counts, appeals and corrected terms do not add independent cases.
Tennessee State/Local Scope
These are Tennessee state court records, not federal judgments. The Tennessee statutory reference is not automatically the version governing a historical offense. No current numerical minimum or maximum is asserted.
Selected Historical Outcomes
| Case | Offense-location evidence | Term and judgment scope | Decision source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantreal Underwood | 2002 opinion identifies August 28, 1993 Serve-Rite robbery in Memphis; no precise street point supplied | Eight years on each of two robbery convictions, concurrent robbery terms; separate 25-year murder term. Scope: target-count terms, not 25 years robbery or two independent cases | Relevant court opinion |
| Johnny Wilkerson | 2016 opinion locates January 24, 2014 taking outside an apartment near University of Memphis; exact point open | 2016/2020 robbery records: 20 years each, consecutive, 40 effective. Scope: historical target-count structure; 2024 same-case assault label conflicts and remains unresolved | Relevant court opinion |
Underwood: Separate Robbery Counts and Later Review
The March 14, 2002 opinion, W2000-01774-CCA-R3-PC, reports two concurrent eight-year robbery terms and a separate 25-year second-degree-murder sentence. It recounts the October 9, 1997 direct affirmance and affirms denial of post-conviction relief. Its discussion of a rejected three-to-four-year plea offer is not an imposed sentence. Neither opinion date is substituted for an unknown original sentencing day; two robbery counts remain one prosecution.
Wilkerson: Match the Docket Before Changing the Crime Label
The November 7, 2016 direct opinion and January 30, 2020 post-conviction opinion, reproduced by Justia, identify aggravated robbery and 20 years on each of two counts, consecutive. Both use Shelby case 14-03148. The October 1, 2024 Rule 36.1 opinion copy, W2023-01478-CCA-R3-CD, also uses that case, terms and earlier appeals but labels the convictions aggravated assault. It affirms denial of the sentence motion, not a new conviction or sentence.
The discrepancy is disclosed, not silently declared a clerical error or treated as a verified change to the conviction. This record is withheld from fully qualified target-offense comparison pending original-judgment/corrected-opinion reconciliation. The robbery events, original conviction and later collateral appeals are not new independent prosecutions.
Source and Comparison Limits
Relevant court-text passages were read September 28, 2026 UTC (September 29 in Istanbul). Direct official retrieval sometimes returned a browser-validation page; readable court reproductions are identified above rather than represented as a fresh official-host download. Complete later-docket, historical-law and municipal-point checks remain open. No average, typical term, prediction, actual time served or guaranteed release is calculated.
These selected reported records are not all Memphis cases, an average, a typical sentence or a prediction. Imposed terms and unsuspended portions do not establish time actually served or a release date. Read the case-selection methodology, editorial standards and Memphis sentencing hub. This is general information, not legal advice.