How Many Years Can You Get for Having Weapons While Under Disability in Toledo?
Quick answer: Capers Warren, Jr. and Adrian Armstrong each received an 18-month term for having weapons while under disability in the two selected Toledo prosecutions. The comparison uses only these two target-count outcomes across two defendants; other concurrent sentences are not added. It is not a citywide minimum or maximum, an average or a prediction.
- Lowest observed: 1.5 years (18 months)
- Highest observed: 1.5 years (18 months)
- Completed cases reviewed: 2
- Range-eligible cases: 2
- Excluded cases: 0
- Evidence reviewed: September 28, 2026
Observed case evidence
| Case | Offense location | Conviction | Final target-offense sentence | Sentence scope | Range eligible? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capers Warren, Jr. | 1770 Buckingham Street in Toledo, Ohio | Having weapons while under disability | 18 months in prison | Target weapon-disability sentence. | Yes | Court opinion reproduced by Justia |
| Adrian Armstrong | Nevada Street in Toledo, Ohio | Having weapons while under disability and carrying a concealed weapon (2023 case); aggravated drug possession (2020 case) | 18 months for weapon disability; 12 months for the 2023 concealed-weapon conviction; 11 months for the 2020 aggravated drug-possession conviction. All concurrent (¶28); judgments affirmed (¶52). | Count-specific 18-month weapons-under-disability term; concurrent concealed-weapon and drug terms excluded. The 2020 concealed-weapon charge ended in acquittal, not the separately convicted 2023 charge. | Yes | Court opinion reproduced by Justia |
Observed range is not the statutory range
The observed range above comes only from the small selected public-reporting sample shown in the table. It is not a statutory minimum or maximum, average, typical result, prediction, plea estimate, or citywide distribution. The statute and sentencing rules applicable on the offense date, the exact count of conviction, criminal history, enhancements, and other case-specific facts control.
Sentence-scope rules
Only a prison term assigned to the target offense or target count is used in the numeric range. Unallocated multi-offense totals, multiple defendants in one prosecution, nonfinal matters, non-city conduct, life terms, probation-only outcomes, and noncomparable sentence types are excluded rather than estimated. Federal and state/local outcomes are never mixed.
Methodology and disclaimer
Each range-producing row is a separate completed prosecution with offense conduct inside Toledo, a final target-offense conviction and sentence, and a clickable case source. Read the methodology, editorial standards, and the Toledo sentencing hub. This page is general information, not legal advice.