Milwaukee Homicide by Intoxicated Use of a Vehicle Sentence: Case Outcomes
Wisconsin uses homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle for the fatal impaired-driving convictions discussed here. This guide does not substitute another state’s vehicular-manslaughter terminology or combine ordinary OWI penalties with fatal-crash outcomes.
Three selected reports describe different sentence scopes: Ellis six years initial confinement plus four years extended supervision on the homicide count; Anderson a reported 14 plus eight across five convictions; Ford-Turner four plus four after homicide and injury pleas without count allocation. They are not three fully qualified comparable city-only homicide terms or an observed four-to-14-year range.
Observed Outcomes
| Case | Milwaukee offense location | Final sentence reported | Sentence scope | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Ellis | 11th Street and Atkinson Avenue, Milwaukee | 6 years in prison and 4 years extended supervision; sentenced January 23, 2020 after a guilty plea. | Target homicide count; alternative homicide charge dismissed and suspended-license charge dismissed/read in. Judgment affirmed in 2021. | Sentencing source |
| Christopher Anderson | 28th and State Streets, Milwaukee | 14 years in prison and 8 years extended supervision; sentencing reported February 21, 2020 after a five-count jury conviction. | Aggregate five-count sentence, including intoxicated homicide and OWI with a passenger under 16; not an isolated homicide term. | Sentencing source |
| Justin Ford-Turner | North 35th and West Townsend Streets, Milwaukee | 4 years in prison and 4 years extended supervision; sentenced February 17, 2012 following guilty pleas. | Combined homicide and injury outcome; the report does not allocate a separate sentence to the injury count. | Sentencing source |
Ellis: Matched Court Review
The August 24, 2021 order, 2020AP2134-CRNM / 2019CF3720, pages 2–3 and 6, confirms a single homicide-by-intoxicated-use plea under section 940.09(1)(a), six years initial confinement plus four years supervision and $2,000 restitution. The alternative homicide count was dismissed; the suspended-license count was dismissed and read in, not a second conviction. It dates the incident August 19, 2019 and the plea questionnaire October 31, 2019, without giving the plea-hearing day. The court summarily affirmed, including review of a denied sentence-modification motion. The December 15, 2021 order denied Supreme Court review; it is not a second conviction or new prison term.
The January 25, 2020 news report places the sentence on January 23 and the crash near 11th/Atkinson. Its 158 days custody credit are not additional imposed years. That news report’s December plea reference is not substituted for the court’s separately dated questionnaire.
Anderson and Ford-Turner: Allocation Limits
Anderson’s February 21, 2020 report identifies a December 2019 five-count jury verdict and 14 years prison plus eight years supervision after the June 2018 crash near 28th/State. It does not supply an exact sentencing day or all five count-level terms. Same-name Oneida intentional-homicide and 2002 vehicle-consent appeals are not matched to this Milwaukee intoxicated-homicide judgment.
Ford-Turner’s February 17, 2012 report places sentencing on that Friday: four years prison plus four years supervision and $7,277 restitution after December homicide and injury pleas. It locates the May 28, 2011 crash at North 35th/West Townsend. The other driver’s nine-month jail term concerns OWI and revoked-license offenses, not an additional independently comparable homicide-by-intoxicated-use result.
How to Read These Sentences
The three proceedings demonstrate why the count structure matters. Ellis’s reported outcome concerns one homicide count, whereas the Anderson and Ford-Turner reports describe combined outcomes. A lower combined term in one case does not establish a statutory floor or predict another defendant’s sentence.
Wisconsin initial confinement and extended supervision are separate components. A total sentence is not automatically a prison term. Older parole-based judgments also require their own terminology rather than a conversion into modern supervision components.
Scope and Limits
The Wisconsin State Law Library elements guide provides legal terminology and warns that its compilation may not be current. Consult the applicable law and judgment for a particular case; this page does not state a statutory sentencing range.
These selected reported outcomes are not all Milwaukee cases, an average, a typical sentence or a prediction. Source-described streets and incident points are not automatically independent municipal-boundary certification. Full city qualification, applicable historical law and complete later-docket review remain open. Prison, supervision, custody credit, fines and restitution are not added together as prison time.
Relevant sentencing, conviction and location passages were read September 28, 2026 UTC (September 29 in Istanbul). Focused official name/court searches were bounded, not exhaustive docket clearance. Matched court results are identified only where stated in this article. No numerical observed range is asserted.
Find currently published guides on the Milwaukee city hub. Review our case-selection methodology and editorial standards for source and sample limitations. This material is general information, not advice about an individual case.